Be the name AI gives someone looking for help.

Nobody calls to tell you. A client who asks ChatGPT for a trauma therapist gets a confident answer, and if it names someone else, you never know. We measure what eight engines say about your practice and fix what they get wrong.

API responses approximate but do not exactly match consumer app answers; we report these numbers as trend and share of voice comparisons, never as absolute truth.

client overview
Mental and Behavioral Health view of the Nimbletoad AI visibility portal

A real client portal. Confidential details blurred, the format is exactly what you get.

ChatGPTPerplexityClaudeGeminiGoogle AI OverviewsGoogle AI ModeCopilotGrok
Why behavioral health is different

Be on the shortlist
that actually gets contacted

Most prospective clients research quietly, compare a few names, and contact one. When that research happens inside an AI chat, the engine's answer is the shortlist, and being on it is what fills your calendar.

Modality confusion
“They primarily offer [a therapy the practice does not provide].”

Wrong specialty, wrong client fit. Engines blur therapy modalities together, sending you inquiries you cannot serve and sending your actual fit elsewhere.

The generic answer trap
“[Modality] is an evidence based treatment for trauma…”

The engine praises your field and never names you. We measure being recommended separately from the topic being discussed, because only one of them fills your calendar.

Invented logistics
“They have a six month waitlist and do not take insurance.”

Neither claim is true. Prospective clients pre-qualify themselves out based on logistics the engine made up.

Competitor by default
“For that, I would recommend [the practice the engine prefers].”

Someone holds the answer today. The battle map shows exactly who, on which question, on which engine, with the engine's own words as receipts.

What prospective clients ask

The questions AI answers
about practices like yours

trauma therapist near me who takes my insuranceEMDR therapy for PTSD in [city]therapist for teen anxiety in [city]couples counseling that is not a waitlistdoes [modality] actually work

Example question shapes, not client panels. Your panel is built from the way clients in your specialty and your region actually ask, and you see every question.

The loop, for behavioral health

Measured monthly.
Watched weekly.

1

Measure

Your client questions go to all eight engines every month. We score who gets named and, separately, who gets recommended: you, or the practice the engine prefers today.

2

Diagnose

Every wrong claim about your practice gets a root cause and a fix plan aimed at the sources the engine actually cites.

3

Fix

Corrections and content grounded only in the verified practice facts in your Context Ledger, approved by you in a private portal before anything ships.

4

Prove

The next measurement confirms what the engines stopped claiming and where you became visible. Behavioral health clients also get the weekly watchdog with same day alerts.

The full mechanism, including the battle map, receipts, and methodology, lives on the AI Visibility Engine page. Do the fixing yourself from our briefs, or have us write and ship it for you. We run your measurement before the demo, so the call opens on your own map.

The engine in 90 seconds

See one full month, start to finish.

The questions we put to the engines, the answers they gave back word for word, a wrong claim traced to the page that caused it, and the next measurement checking whether it stopped. Real product screens, not a mockup.

the AI Visibility Engine

Real product screens with confidential details blurred; the receipt scene uses a sample client.

Behavioral health questions

Asked by practices like yours

Do people really ask AI about therapy?

Yes, and often precisely because it is private. Questions people hesitate to ask a friend, a doctor, or even a search engine with an account attached get asked to an AI chat. The engines answer with specific practice names and clinical claims. If the engine recommends someone else, or describes your practice incorrectly, you never know that person existed.

Our name includes our modality. Does that help or hurt?

It cuts both ways, and we measure the difference explicitly. Engines often answer questions about the modality in general, cite everyone in the field, and never name your practice. Our recommendation classifier separates "the engine discussed the therapy" from "the engine recommended you", so your numbers never get inflated by generic modality mentions.

How fast would we hear about a new wrong claim?

Behavioral health clients sit in our weekly accuracy watchdog tier alongside healthcare. Branded control checks run every week, and a new wrong claim raises a same day alert instead of waiting for the monthly cycle.

How many times do you ask each question, and do you show when the answers disagreed?

Every engine gets every question multiple times each month, because AI answers are not stable the way a search result is. The same question an hour later can name a different set of businesses. Your battle map shows the count on any cell where the samples disagreed, so a result won three times out of three is never displayed as though it were the same as one won once. Across everything we measured last month, 8.6 percent of multi-sample cells came back differently from one ask to the next. We would rather show you that number than average it away.

Find out what AI tells your future clients

The audit shows where your practice is invisible, who the engines recommend instead, and what they get factually wrong. Reviewed by a person before it reaches you.

Book a Demo